Skip to content
Komposite News
Markets · Technology · Capital
Thursday, September 10, 2026Global EditionGot a tip?
Tokenization

The exemption picks its winners

Goldman and Citizens read the SEC's tokenised-stock order and came to the same conclusion: the venues built for crypto gain, the incumbent exchanges barely notice.

Marcus Oyelaran · Blockchain & Digital Assets Editor
September 20, 20262 min read
Towers of a financial district against a pink and blue dusk skyLeo via Unsplash
A rule written around one market structure is a rule that selects for it.Photograph via Unsplash

The SEC's Innovation Exemption is three days old, and the sell side has already worked out who it is worth money to. The answer says as much about the drafting as about the companies.

Analysts at Goldman Sachs and at Citizens both name Coinbase as the clearest beneficiary, CoinDesk reported, pointing to its custody business, its tokenisation product and its own chain. Citizens lists the same set: custody, tokenised assets, stablecoins and Base.

The qualifying detail is a piece of market plumbing. The exemption is written around automated market makers — pools that price trades by formula — while Coinbase's exchange runs a central limit order book, the matching engine every conventional exchange uses. To use the relief it would need new infrastructure or would have to route through AMM venues on Base.

That is the part worth dwelling on. A regulator writing a rule for a new market has to describe the mechanism it is permitting, and describing it in terms of one design excludes the other. The order does not ban order books; it simply does not exempt them, which for five years amounts to a preference.

Robinhood's position is different again. Its existing stock tokens, offered outside the United States, do not convey the ownership rights the exemption requires, and Vlad Tenev has signalled that redemptions and voting are being added. The order has effectively set a product specification and the venues are building to it.

Circle gains indirectly and probably durably. If tokenised shares settle onchain, something has to be the cash leg, and a regulated dollar stablecoin is the obvious candidate for settlement and collateral in those pools.

The incumbents look insulated, which is the finding that should reassure the Commission most. Goldman expects little disruption to Nasdaq or ICE, citing the trading caps, the issuer opt-out and the limits of automated market makers in deep markets.

Those three conditions were the price of the relief, and they are doing exactly what they were designed to do: keeping the experiment small enough that a failure inside it cannot damage the equity market. An exemption capped by volume cannot move a market; it can only demonstrate whether the mechanism works.

The strategic reading is that the Commission has created a sandbox with commercial value. Firms that already hold crypto licences, custody and chains can enter immediately; firms with conventional market structure must build something new to qualify. For five years, that is a subsidy to the challengers.

What nobody can price yet is the cliff. The relief expires, and what replaces it is either a rulemaking or nothing. The statute that would have settled this failed in the Senate last week, which means the businesses being built on this order are being built on an order.

MORE ON THIS STORY